Did you ever wonder how humans pick their partners? What parameters do we pay attention to when deciding who to mate with? Surely physical attraction plays a role, but is there anything else influencing this choice? Sexual selection plays an important role in the development of relationships.
Explore our app and discover over 50 million learning materials for free.
Lerne mit deinen Freunden und bleibe auf dem richtigen Kurs mit deinen persönlichen Lernstatistiken
Jetzt kostenlos anmeldenNie wieder prokastinieren mit unseren Lernerinnerungen.
Jetzt kostenlos anmeldenDid you ever wonder how humans pick their partners? What parameters do we pay attention to when deciding who to mate with? Surely physical attraction plays a role, but is there anything else influencing this choice? Sexual selection plays an important role in the development of relationships.
Sexual selection refers to the evolutionary explanation describing why humans prefer some partners over others. Sexual selection is deeply rooted in the evolutionary approach and, therefore, explains sexual selection in terms of survival and reproductive success.
In theory, those who exhibit certain characteristics within a population, which allows them to better find a partner to reproduce with, have a reproductive advantage over others.
Being physically attractive, for instance, increases the chances of finding a partner.
What traits are deemed desirable varies across cultures and societies. Due to the increased chances of finding a partner, these features have an increased chance of being passed down to children.
They become more common as generations pass.
For example, the waist-to-hip ratio in women is linked to chances of reproducing (fertility). Because of this, partners may prefer a particular waist-to-hip ratio to increase the chances of coupling with a women with higher fertility. We will discuss more on this later.
In line with the sexual selection definition, human reproductive behaviour is part of adaption, and therefore, individuals look for certain characteristics in their potential partners.
The types of sexual selection emerge based on the strategies that women and men engage in regarding sexual selection. There are two types of sexual selection: inter-sexual selection and intra-sexual selection.
Inter-sexual selection refers to the competing nature males use to gain the attention of female partners. The female partner then chooses who they would like to mate with based on certain traits and preferences.
We can see inter-sexual attraction in some animal species.
Male birds, for instance, often have colourful feathers and perform dances to attract female attention.
Now, let's explore intra-sexual selection.
Intra-sexual selection refers to when males compete for a female of the same species, and the winner claims the right to mate with the female. Oftentimes, competing takes the form of aggression.
Intra-sexual selection may also explain physical differences between men and women. Some theories postulate that men are generally stronger and bigger as they need to maintain evolutionarily desirable characteristics to be selected by women (if men were bigger and stronger, they are more likely to survive and provide).
On the other hand, women choose mates to protect them and therefore do not need to have such traits to enable them to survive or reproduce. Instead, they develop traits desirable to the opposite sex.
In 1989, psychologist David Buss surveyed the sexual selection and reproductive behaviour of over 10,000 adults' in 33 countries.
This shows the idea of anisogamy influences mate choice as men focus more on reproduction as they can reproduce more, whereas women seek to invest in a mate as they have a finite amount of time and reproductive cells to reproduce.
Similarly, Clark and Hatfield (1989) investigated differences between male and female reproductive behaviour on university campuses.
The study supports the idea that women are much more selective and engage in inter-sexual selection (carefully picking mates), whereas men are intra-sexual (picked by women).
The two types of sexual selection strategies described above can be seen in the Andean cock-of-the-rock bird. These birds are found in South America and are very colourful.
Their sexual selection strategy is very well-defined.
This is an example of how intra-sexual selection takes place through two birds competing against one another. The inter-sexual selection strategy involves the female watching how the males engage in the lek.
The relationship between sexual selection and human reproduction has been widely explored in psychological literature.
Some of the literature has focussed on physical attractiveness. Physical attractiveness refers to what individuals find physically appealing about the person. Although there are individual differences in physical attractiveness, there is some consensus on what individuals find attractive.
Singh (1993) studied the preferred waist-to-hip ratio of men as a sign of female fertility. When studying the waist-to-hip ratio of Miss America winners over a decade, they found that men generally find a waist-to-hip ratio of 0.7 attractive (large hips and a slim waist).
Singh argued that men unconsciously take this as a sign that a woman is fertile and healthy, so the attraction is motivated by the evolutionary desire to reproduce.
Waynforth and Dunbar (1995) also conducted a study on attractiveness.
The study demonstrates how males and females display their traits to potential partners and identify characteristics they deem most desirable to the opposite sex.
Further evidence of the relationship between sexual selection and reproduction comes from Buss' (1995) study in which he explores jealousy in males and females.
As we discussed above, males and females tend to have different choices when it comes to sexual selection. As a result, this has a direct impact on reproductive behaviour. Sexual selection is the prelude to reproductive behaviour; sexual selection identifies the best candidate to mate with, affecting human reproductive behaviour.
Women will seek strong, independent, high-resource men to secure their futures and increase their chances of survival, and men will seek attractive, youthful women to increase their chances of reproducing. This may affect short-term and long-term partner choices.
Males, for instance, may prefer short-term, casual relationships to increase their chances of securing offspring. Whilst men are most fertile in their younger years, much like women, they continue to be fertile throughout their lives (although their ability to reproduce declines with age), unlike women.
Females' fertility declines more harshly than males, and after menopause, women can no longer conceive children. Females may be more selective in sexual selection choices, as they have a finite amount of time to reproduce.
Sexual selection and reproductive behaviour often link back to times when humans were hunter-gatherers.
Evolutionary psychology suggests desirable traits are indicators of successful genes that increase the chances of survival.
Interestingly, natural selection and sexual selection can conflict. Features deemed attractive can be linked to lower chances of survival. A male bird with bright feathers, whilst is deemed desirable to female birds, it will naturally stand out and attract predators. However, the increased chances of attracting female attention to produce offspring are worth the potential sacrifice.
This is also found in human reproductive behaviour, as certain traits are linked to disadvantages, yet they are deemed attractive.
Buss (1989) supports the theory of sexual selection through their study using questionnaires. They gathered data from 10,000 men and women.
Singh (1993) also supports the theory with their argument regarding waist-to-hip ratio preferences. Singh (2002) linked the waist-to-hip ratio to health and reproductive abilities.
While the evolutionary perspective has provided extensive research on sexual selection, it is not exempt from criticism.
One of the main arguments that have been provided that question the approach is the presence of gender bias. The sexual selection theory suggests that short-term mating is more common in males. However, this would not be a phenomenon if females were unwilling.
Furthermore, Greiling and Buss (2000) found that women can also show a preference for mate-switching because this encourages the diversity of their offspring.
Furthermore, this theory fails to account for major social and cultural changes which may affect reproductive behaviour.
Today women are not dependent on men for survival and men can tell if a child is theirs or not through DNA testing.
This means that women do not have to invest as deeply in finding the perfect mate, and men do not have to spread their seed so widely to be sure they have a child. Therefore, nowadays, mate choice is likely influenced by factors other than just evolutionary preferences.
Buss (1989) also identified more similarities than differences in sexual selection. Resources was not deemed as important as mutual attraction and intelligence.
Sexual selection refers to the evolutionary explanation describing why humans prefer some partners over others. There are two main types of sexual selection strategies: inter-sexual and intra-sexual selection.
Inter-sexual selection refers to the competing nature males use to gain the attention of female partners. Intra-sexual selection refers to when males compete for a female of the same species, and the winner claims the right to mate with the female.
An example of sexual selection is the waist-to-hip ratio preferences in women, where Singh (1993) found that a waist-to-hip ratio of 0.7 was deemed the most attractive due to its links with reproductive abilities and health.
Evidence of the relationship between sexual selection and human productive behaviour comes from research looking into physical attractiveness. Certain characteristics increase the chances of reproducing and securing a mate, known as reproductive advantages.
Sexual selection cannot explain all types of mate choice these days. Social and cultural changes discount the theory, and Buss (1989) found more similarities than differences in their study on differences in mate selection.
Sexual selection is the prelude to reproductive behaviour; sexual selection identifies the best candidate to mate with, affecting human reproductive behaviour. Women will seek strong, independent, high-resource men to secure their futures and increase their chances of survival, and men will seek attractive, youthful women to increase their chances of reproducing.
Sexual selection refers to the evolutionary explanation describing why humans prefer some partners over others. Males and females may perform certain behaviours to increase their chances of finding a mate and reproducing.
Human reproductive behaviour refers to how people search for potential partners and produce offspring.
Sexual selection refers to the evolutionary explanation describing why humans prefer some partners over others. Sexual selection is deeply rooted in the evolutionary approach and, therefore, explains sexual selection in terms of survival and reproductive success.
Intrasexual selection is when potential mates compete for a partner, usually in the form of aggression. A good example is when animals fight with horns or claws to win the right to mate with a female.
How can anisogamy explain human reproduction?
Anisogamy refers to the fusion of different between male and female cells during reproduction. If women only produce a finite amount of eggs in a set period of time, they are more selective of their partners, whereas men's surplus of sperm and ability to reproduce over a long period of time means that they are less selective and aim to be chosen by females.
Evolutionarily speaking, which sex is most likely to engage in inter-sexual selection?
Women. They have fewer reproductive cells (eggs) and it takes much more time and energy to produce offspring meaning they need to carefully choose their sexual partners.
What did Buss discover in his 1989 study?
Buss (1989) supports the theory of sexual selection through their study using questionnaires. They gathered data from 10,000 men and women.
Evaluate evolutionary explanations of human reproduction.
There is research to support evolutionary explanations, such as Waynforth's and Dunbar and Buss's studies. However, it remains the case that much has changed since humans evolved, and humans do not need to rely on their sexual partners for survival.
Buss (1989) also found more similarities than differences in sexual selection across genders.
Give an example of an evolutionarily desirable characteristic for sexual selection?
In men, strength and physical fitness are desirable as they indicate they can protect and provide for offspring.
Why are evolutionary explanations of sexual selection disputed?
They are not applicable today. We no longer need evolutionary characteristics to survive. E.g women don't need men for resources.
Already have an account? Log in
Open in AppThe first learning app that truly has everything you need to ace your exams in one place
Sign up to highlight and take notes. It’s 100% free.
Save explanations to your personalised space and access them anytime, anywhere!
Sign up with Email Sign up with AppleBy signing up, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and the Privacy Policy of StudySmarter.
Already have an account? Log in
Already have an account? Log in
The first learning app that truly has everything you need to ace your exams in one place
Already have an account? Log in